I met people, active Christians at that, who said that the Sinner’s prayer is not necessary for salvation. Citing dispensations, these Christians are so bold in coming up saying that if it were so, then what could have happened to the Old Testament believers who may not have prayed this prayer?
Of this idea, let me propose the following and draw a conclusion.
Proposition 1. There is a need for a sinner to realize his sinfulness and helplessness before God before atonement is made possible. God has always mentioned that he hates and will punish sin and we all know of this to apply to the entire dispensations of time. (Rom. 3:23, 6:23, 3:10, Eze. 18).
Proposition 2. God sent His perfect and Just Son, to die for the Unjust, His death being the penalty for such sin mentioned in Proposition 1. (John 3:16, 2 Pet. 3:18, Heb. 9).
Proposition 3. There must be an acknowledgment on the sinner’s behalf on the propitiatory work of Christ on the cross, and on the Person of Jesus Christ himself, as His Savior, to make that redemption and atonement take place (Prov. 28:13, Psa. 32:5).
The issue now remains – should that acknowledgment be made verbal or not? Or course, if a person were dumb, this is not possible, so the answer that may conveniently taken is no. But the possibility exists, although not mentioned, that that could be an exception. We look into references whether such verbal acknowledgment of ADMISSION, RESPONSIBILITY AND PLEA FOR CLEMENCY is indeed necessary.
None of this can be found in Old Testament and only in Romans 10:9 is this made very clear. Hence dispensationalists argue that this is only true for the New Testament times. However, let me put forth the following:
Proposition 4. Salvation has always been NOT BY ANY MERIT by the object of such salvation, i.e., the sinner. Even in the Old Testament, faith is the means of salvation (Romans 4).
Having seen that grace is the defining gift of God which has made possible salvation, it therefore follows that Romans 10:9 would apply to Old Testament sinners.
The question is then raised why it is not mentioned or recorded in the Old Testament.
The answer is given in that the Sinner’s Prayer as we may have been teaching others how to pray, may not be exactly of the same order or form then than that of today. For example, ending the prayer in Christ Jesus’ name may not have been done since Jesus was not yet revealed in those times. However, all four propositions should be present. And these can easily be located in many Old Testament passages.
Let us then take heed lest we forget how we got our salvation. I remember the thief who in his dying moments said it – and in a version which may not follow exactly what we been doing. All the concepts of the propositions above were present there and may not have been contained in his last recorded words, but obviously present of his rebuke to the other thief.
Let us take heed since there are many, especially coming from the false brethren, espousing Romish doctrines, that the sinner’s prayer is not necessary.
Lastly, the Sinner’s Prayer as we know it today may have been coined a few years back but one thing sure – even if it was not called the Sinner’s Prayer then or may have varied from what we know today, the prayer that a sinner calls to God crying for forgiveness and clemency is the prayer that is a sweet savor to a merciful and loving God.